This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lorinskas, R. Articles by Banas, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Symbolism and Rhetoric: The Guardians of Status Quo in the Criminal Justice System

Center for the Study of Crime and Delinquency, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 69001

David Kalinich

Dennis Banas

School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824

This study argues that criminal justice bureaucracies depend upon symbolism and rhetoric as a major component of organizational stability. Because political pressures on the criminal justice system are usually reactive rather than systematic and sustaining, pressures can be placated through symbolic and rhetorical responses rather than substantive responses. It is further argued that much of what appeared to be changes in philosophies or processes of criminal justice agencies may have merely been symbolism or window dressing. Ironically, the reliance on symbols to legitimize the workings of the criminal justice system can lead to substantive change. In those instances when important symbols have eroded, criminal justice agencies dependent upon such symbols have been made politically vulnerable, and substantive change has also taken place.

Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 41-46 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/073401688501000106


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?