Criminal Justice Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hochstedler, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1-11 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/073401688701200102

Criminal Prosecution of the Mentally Disordered: A Descriptive Analysis

Ellen Hochstedler

Department of Criminal Justice, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201

While the mentally disordered defendant has garnered notable attention recently, little empirical research has been conducted in this area. In an attempt to fill this void, the research effort reported here examines prosecutorial and judicial decisions concerning this type of defendant. Emphasis is placed on the postures (punitive or therapeu tic) assumed by these court officials and the impact of various factors on these postures. Data were gathered on all adult criminal defendants identified as mentally disordered by the Milwaukee, Wisconsin Mental Health Screening Unit from 1981 through 1983. The results clearly indicate that criminal justice officials are at least as interested in therapy as they are in punishment. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the court views these defendants as inappropriate subjects for criminal sanctioning but under certain conditions mandates treatment for individuals who likely would not be subject to such involuntary treatment under civil law.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?