This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Eigenberg, H. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Homosexuality in Male Prisons: Demonstrating the Need for a Social Constructionist Approach

This paper analyses homosexuality in male prisons and argues that the essentialist approach has dominated research in this area. Essentialists define homosexuality as a static trait and dichotomize sexuality into two categories, homosexuals and heterosexuals. A review of the literature on male homosexuality suggests that an essentialist approach resulted in a paradoxical situation in which researchers were forced to account for "normal" heterosexuals who engaged in situational homosexual behavior while in prison; because the very existence of "situational homosexuality" was inconsistent with essentialist definitions of homosexuality, researchers instead shifted the focus to sexual deprivation and then proceeded to include rape in typologies that purported to address homosexuality. Thus, distinctions between consensual homosexual behavior and rape were blurred. As a result of this conceptual ambiguity and because of paradigmatic changes in the study of homosexuality, there is a tremendous void in the literature on homosexuality in prison. This paper argues that a social constructionist approach would add to our understanding of homosexuality in male prisons.

Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, 219-234 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/073401689201700204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Hensley, M. Koscheski, and R. Tewksbury Examining the Characteristics of Male Sexual Assault Targets in a Southern Maximum-Security Prison J Interpers Violence, June 1, 2005; 20(6): 667 - 679. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. HENSLEY, C. STRUCKMAN-JOHNSON, and H. M. EIGENBERG Introduction: The History of Prison Sex Research The Prison Journal, December 1, 2000; 80(4): 360 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. M. EIGENBERG Correctional Officers and Their Perceptions of Homosexuality, Rape, and Prostitution in Male Prisons The Prison Journal, December 1, 2000; 80(4): 415 - 433. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. F. ALARID Sexual Orientation Perspectives of Incarcerated Bisexual and Gay Men: The County Jail Protective Custody Experience The Prison Journal, March 1, 2000; 80(1): 80 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. VAUGHN and R. V. DEL CARMEN Civil Liability Against Prison Officials for Inmate-On-Inmate Assault: Where are We and Where Have We Been? The Prison Journal, March 1, 1995; 75(1): 69 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]