Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bazemore, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Formal Policy and Informal Process in the Implementation of Juvenile Justice Reform

Gordon Bazemore

The study of policy and program implementation has advanced significantly in the past two decades, but relatively little attention has been paid to the complex issues involved in expanding promising local models for reforming justice agencies to other jurisdictions. This paper examines statewide implementation of a legislatively mandated reform intended to restrict and rationalize the use of juvenile detention based on a successful local model. Though statewide aggregate data indicate initial success in the use of formal intake criteria to reduce secure detention populations, early revisions of a risk assessment instrument used to objectively determine restrictiveness levels signify concern on the part of some decision makers to restore discretion over the use of secure detention. Detention intake data from one county facility are used to illustrate the potential impact of these changes on detention populations and to explore the role of informal processes, as well as that of formal criteria, as a key factor in expanding the implementation of local reforms.

Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, 26-45 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/073401689301800104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Prison JournalHome page
G. BAZEMORE and T. J. DICKER
Implementing Detention Intake Reform: The Judicial Response
The Prison Journal, March 1, 1996; 76(1): 5 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
G. Bazemore, T. J. Dicker, and R. Nyhan
Juvenile Justice Reform and the Difference it Makes: An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Policy Change on Detention Worker Attitudes
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1994; 40(1): 37 - 53.
[Abstract]