Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Waltman, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Notes

Do more Conservative States Impose Harsher Felony Sentences? An Exploratory Analysis of 32 States

David A. Bowers

Jerold L. Waltman

Felony sentencing is a state public policy outcome lying at the end of a long chain of decisions by legislatures, bureaucracies, and courts. Using data from the 1986 National Judicial Reporting Program study of 32 states, the authors discovered that felony sentences for rape, assault, and robbery were linked to the Erikson, McIver, and Wright index of state conservatism (1987), whereas those for homicide and property crimes were not correlated with ideology. The addition of resource variables such as tax capacity and prison capacity was found not to alter these findings. These results make sense, given the intense public antipathy to crimes against persons; the exception for murder may derive from the fact that a uniform abhorrence of murderers subdues the effect of liberal and conservative ideologies. Therefore, the preferences of the public seem to weigh heavily in the sentencing of violent offenders (other than murderers) but have much less if any effect on the fate of other criminals.

Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, 61-70 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/073401689301800106
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
R. R. Weidner, R. S. Frase, and J. S. Schultz
The Impact of Contextual Factors on the Decision to Imprison in Large Urban Jurisdictions: A Multilevel Analysis
Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2005; 51(3): 400 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
R. R. Weidner and R. S. Frase
Legal and Extralegal Determinants of Intercounty Differences in Prison Use
Criminal Justice Policy Review, September 1, 2003; 14(3): 377 - 400.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
J. Sorensen and D. Stemen
The Effect of State Sentencing Policies on Incarceration Rates
Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2002; 48(3): 456 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Prison JournalHome page
W. S. W. HUANG, M. A. FINN, R. B. RUBACK, and R. R. FRIEDMANN
Individual and Contextual Influences on Sentence Lengths: Examining Political Conservatism
The Prison Journal, December 1, 1996; 76(4): 398 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]