This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nasheri, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Exclusionary Rule: Differing Trends in Canada and the United States

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the Canadian and American criminal justice systems by analyzing one facet of both systems-the exclusionary rule. More specifically, this article explores whether Canada and the United States are moving toward expanding the exclusionary rule in protecting the rights of the criminally accused or are moving toward limiting the applicability of the rule and favoring the state in prosecuting the accused. The article concludes, based on an analysis of recent case law from the high courts of both countries, that the exclusionary rule is currently on different and apparently diverging tracks. In Canada before 1982, the exclusionary rule was nonexistent. Since 1982, with the enactment of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the exclusionary rule has quickly and steadily expanded. The United States, in contrast, has been restricting the exclusionary rule for years. According to the trends seen in each country, the article predicts that Canada will continue the gradual expansion toward a more absolutist exclusionary rule that began with the enactment of the Charter in 1982, while the United States will continue to limit the use of the exclusionary rule in an attempt to give prosecutors greater power in prosecuting criminally accused individuals.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?