This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McCoy, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Congress is (Not) Repealing the Exclusionary Rule! Symbolic Politics and Criminal Justice (Non)Reform

In 1984, the U.S. Supreme Court approved a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule in cases where a warrant was wrongfully issued, but the Court has declined to extend it to warrantless cases. Because the majority of searches fall under exceptions to the warrant clause and thus are conducted without warrants, providing a good faith defense to constitutional challenges in these caseswould in effectrepeal the exclusionary rule. Such legislation has been proposed in Congress, but it is unlikely to pass. Even if it did pass, however, it would not change police accountability to the Fourth Amendmentmuch, because the exclusionary rule probably only minimally deters police misconduct, a matter that is difficult to explore empirically. Furthermore, the proposed legislation would apply only to federal and not state law enforcement-with exceptions for the federal police agencies that the bill's sponsors do not like. Despite the fact that the effect of this law would be minimal if it were passed, such legislation will continue to be proposed because the exclusionary rule is a condensation symbol for law and order ideologues who oppose it as a means of symbolically marking their political territory.

Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 181-196 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/073401689602100205


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. E. Marion and W. M. Oliver Congress, Crime, and Budgetary Responsiveness: A Study in Symbolic Politics Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2009; 20(2): 115 - 135. [Abstract] [PDF]