Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burns, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lynch, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Another Fine Mess a Preliminary Examination of the Use of Fines by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Ronald G. Burns

Michael J. Lynch

The behavior of regulatory agencies as it relates to our understanding of corporate crime and corporate harm has not been well studied by criminologists. Indeed, examinations of the federal regulatory system and the behavior of its individual agencies have been largely absent from the criminological literature. This article addresses this deficiency by examining the fining practices of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which is charged with upholding a number of federal laws that regulate the automobile industry. We analyzed all cases in four regulatory areas that resulted in fines between 1970 and 1997 and in addition observed the impact of various presidential administrations and the 1970s-1980s oil embargo. The results concur with earlier findings regarding the limited regulatory practices observed during the Reagan administration, and they also suggest that fines have a limited impact on corporate behavior. The article concludes by recommending that future researchers focus on the deterrent value of fines and the shifting influence of social and political changes on regulatory practices within white-collar crime enforcement.

Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1-25 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/073401680202700102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
M. J. Lynch, R. G. Burns, and J. E. Holcomb
Food for Thought: An Investigation of Food and Drug Administration Reporting Practices, 1995-1999
Criminal Justice Review, December 1, 2005; 30(3): 293 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]