Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Camp, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Saylor, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Using Inmate Survey Data in Assessing Prison Performance a Case Study Comparing Private and Public Prisons

Scott D. Camp

Gerald G. Gaes

Jody Klein-Saffran

Dawn M. Daggett

William G. Saylor

The public sector needs to monitor the performance of the private prisons, and it is necessary to conduct the monitoring as objectively as possible. This article demonstrates that an often overlooked source of data, surveys of inmates, can be used to differentiate prisons on such Was a gag activity, and security, sanitation, and food service delivery. Hierarchical line models were used to generate the prison performance measures. We also show that inmates and staff largely agreed in in their assessments of conditions at the prison. Finally, we demonstrate that although there is considerable consistency for different measures within the topical areas that we examined, there is no necessary correspondence in performance across the different topical areas of gang management, safety and security, sanitation, and food service delivery. Although survey will never and should never replace operational reviews and audits, we demonstrate that they can be effectively used to obtain information about operational differences between prisons.

Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 26-51 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/073401680202700103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
D. M. Daggett and S. D. Camp
Do Official Misconduct Data Tell the Same Story as the Individuals Who Live in Prison?
Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2009; 34(3): 428 - 449.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
N. Wolff and Jing Shi
Feelings of Safety Among Male Inmates: The Safety Paradox
Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2009; 34(3): 404 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
M. W. Ross, P. M. Diamond, A. Liebling, and W. G. Saylor
Measurement of prison social climate: A comparison of an inmate measure in England and the USA
Punishment Society, October 1, 2008; 10(4): 447 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
S. D. Camp and G. G. Gaes
Criminogenic Effects of the Prison Environment on Inmate Behavior: Some Experimental Evidence
Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2005; 51(3): 425 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]