This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Leinfelt, F. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Descriptive Eyewitness Testimony: The Influence of Emotionality, Racial Identification, Question Style, and Selective Perception

North Dakota State University, Department of Criminal Justice and Political Science, Criminal Justice and Public Policy Center, P.O. Box 5101, Fargo, ND 58105-5101 fredrik.leinfelt{at}ndsu.nodak.edu

A number of studies on cross-racial identifications have been undertaken using standard facial recognition paradigms, but modest attention has been paid to the effect of cross-racial identifications in juxtaposition with other influencing factors. The present article examines the impact of race in conjunction with emotionality and question-related variables on descriptive eyewitness recall accuracy. Findings from a controlled experiment (staged crime) with a total of 106 participants from a Midwestem university suggest that descriptive eyewitness recall was influenced by the examined variables-emotionality, race, and type of question asked. Moreover, it was found that eyewitnesses tended to pay more attention to weapons and vehicles during a mock scenario than to perpetrator behavior, perpetrator description, and other information surrounding the event. The results add further evidence to the bulk of literature suggesting that the current usage of eyewitness testimony by the legal system is far from ideal. It is suggested that the high emphasis currently placed on eyewitness accounts be reviewed and reconsidered. Systemic implications of the results are also addressed.

Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, 317-340 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/073401680402900204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?