This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0734016808330589v1 34/3/329    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Copes, H. Articles by Vieraitis, L. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Understanding Identity Theft

Offenders’ Accounts of Their Lives and Crimes

University of Alabama at Birmingham, jhcopes{at}uab.edu

Lynne M. Vieraitis

University of Texas at Dallas

Researchers typically label acts as "white-collar" based on the respectable status of the offender (populist perspective) or on the characteristics of the offense (patrician perspective). However, some crimes, such as identity theft are not easily classified into either of these categories. The current study is designed to contextualize previous research and to situate the crime of identity theft within these two broad perspectives of white-collar crime. To do this, 59 identity thieves incarcerated in federal prisons were interviewed to offer the offenders’ perspectives on existing research describing characteristics of thieves and the techniques they employ to complete their crimes. Results show that identity thieves are a diverse group in terms of demographic characteristics (age, race, gender, and social class), employment, and criminal histories. They employed a variety of methods to both acquire information and convert it to cash. The most common methods of acquiring information were to buy it from others or to steal it from mailboxes or trashcans. They also used numerous methods to convert these identities into valuable goods, which included accessing existing accounts, applying for new credit, and obtaining loans. Thus, the findings show that identity theft is difficult to classify as white-collar crime.

Key Words: identity theft • identity thieves • white-collar crime • fraud

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 34, No. 3, 329-349 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0734016808330589


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?